Comment
COMMENT: Why is a ‘good death’ only available to the rich?
Have you ever stood in a room and imagined the lives of the surrounding strangers? You see a child, the embodiment of purity and naivety. Behind her beaming smile, is a young girl who will one day change the world. You look to your left. There sits an elderly man in a wheelchair. His hair frosty and his face decorated by wrinkles and the reminder that we are getting older. Though he can no longer remember his name or the one who got away, as a 22-year-old, he was a soldier who was drafted to Korea and fought for what he was told was right. Standing beside you is a young man – a man who has a life to live – a life he deserves to live, but is slowly dying of bowel cancer. Externally, he is a spontaneous chap whose laughter is a circus, but internally, he’s a boy who does not want to die, and especially not like this.
But he doesn’t have a choice. At 20-years-old, he will die in a ward, having lived his final year with what felt like a clock ticking away in his mind, knowing he had no control over his own life and death.
This year, it is estimated that 350 Britons will travel to Switzerland to die, and anyone of them could have been standing in that room with you.
When translated into Greek, the word euthanasia means “good death”, so is it not ironic that such a privilege is only reserved for those who are fortunate to be able to afford the £10,000 to travel to Zürich – the largest city in Switzerland and Europe’s ‘assisted dying capital?’
The law makes criminals out of the vulnerable.
In our lives, money burdens and controls us, but apparently it extends into death. So, how accessible is a ‘dignified death’ by assisted suicide in this country? Bluntly, for many it is impossible.
In 2017, the Money Charity’s annual financial report found that 68% of families in this country have less than £10,000 in their savings, while 35% had no savings at all. The criminalisation of assisted dying in the UK does not just discriminate against the dying, but also the poor.
The legalisation of assisted dying in the UK would not only remove the curtain of capitalism from the conversation, but it would make the possibility of a “good death” accessible to all and not just an option for the elitist. For a country which demands equality, is it not ironic that we are denied such rights at the very end?
Although classism encourages the obeying of the 1961 “Suicide Act” which considers assisted dying as a form of murder, it does not prevent it. The law makes criminals out of the vulnerable, the ill and the innocent who are forced to undertake the task themselves.
In 2019, 80-year-old Mavis Eccleston was accused by the justice system of forcing her deceased 81-year-old husband to consume a large amount of lethal prescription drugs. Within the same 24 hours, Mavis became a widow and, according to the law, a criminal, because she decided to honour the final wish of the man whom she loved… A decision which she was forced to undertake because of the outdated “Suicide Act” and because of parliament’s hesitancy to address a reformation of the law.
But euthanasia is not just ‘permitted’ for the elite who can afford to undertake the procedure abroad, according to this country’s history, it is ethically acceptable for a royal to have their tormented death quickened to preserve their dignity. To the public’s knowledge, royal euthanasia has taken place at least twice, when in 1936 George V was given a lethal dose of cocaine and morphine and in 1938 with his sister Queen Maud of Norway.
In accordance with the ideology of the late Debbie Purdy, a fundamental contributor to the discussion of euthanasia, nobody wants to die, they just do not want to suffer any longer. Our outdated law is not only encouraging the continued suffering of the dying, but also criminalising them and their families for even the consideration of terminating their lives.
As Britons, our right to life is protected under the Human Rights Act, but it seems to forget that to live, we have to die and to die, we have to have lived.
“We don’t want to die alone or abandoned, but most of all, nobody wants to die in pain.” -Professor Pierre Mallia.
Comment
REVIEW: From the Pyre – The Last Dinner Party
⭐⭐⭐⭐/5
A thrilling new album inspired by folk-horror.
⭐⭐⭐⭐/5 – enigmatic, dramatic, emotional
Following an explosive debut album, The Last Dinner Party has released their second, From the Pyre.
Although this new album shifts slightly from their original baroque-pop style, the dramatics have certainly not been left behind.
The three singles, Second Best, This is the Killer Speaking, and The Scythe are just as flamboyant and epic as the singles from Prelude to Ecstasy.
Abigail Morris’ vocals are still enchanting, and the instrumentals (Lizzie Mayland, Emily Roberts, Georgia Davies, Aurora Nishevci) which would feel erratic and disjointed in any other album, keep the listener excited.
The first track, Agnus Dei, introduces the band’s classic use of religious imagery, and Count The Ways has a catchy backing.
Especially when performed live – like in Southampton on Sunday – these are a near perfect opening to the album, ever flamboyant and a spectacle to behold.
The track list picks up with two of the singles (Second Best and This is the Killer Speaking) followed by anti-war anthem Rifle and Woman is a Tree, which is inspired by the TV show Yellowjackets.
They keep the energy going, and Rifle rings especially poignant following the most recent ceasefire deal in Gaza.
It is the strongest non-single song, building up into a cacophony of urgency and emotion led by guitarist Mayland.
Unfortunately, the album falters after this, with the style shifting in a way that may make audiences think they have suddenly switched albums.
I Hold Your Anger and Sail Away aren’t bad songs, nor are they poorly performed, but their tone and style is just so different from the other songs that they sound more like a last minute addition to bulk out the run time than a deliberate choice to have a lull in energy in the middle of the album.
The Scythe does manage to pick the energy back up in time for the end of the 42-minute runtime, and is perhaps the best track overall.
Originally about a teenage breakup, the lyricism strikes a chord deep within anyone who has experienced a loss, and the theatrical feeling shows off exactly what this band is capable of.
Inferno is not a bad ending to the album by any means; it’s a decently strong song and feels more closely aligned with The Last Dinner Party’s usual style.
Adorned with religious imagery, filled with a beautiful range of vocals, and final notes that blend seamlessly back into the beginning of Agnus Dei, it should be quite the showstopper.
But, similar to its first album counterpart Mirror, it doesn’t quite hold up the energy created by the track before it, releasing some of that folk-horror movie tension the album is inspired by.
It’s symptomatic of a larger problem; this album is just a bit rushed, and a bit underwhelming compared to its predecessor.
Despite all of the individual songs being good, even excellent at times, the album as a whole feels ever so slightly disconnected from itself.
Perhaps this is intentional, to keep the listener uneasy, but it mainly comes across as a let-down from their carefully constructed debut from 2024.
Such a heavy contrast isn’t necessarily a bad move, it was simply executed poorly.
The band themselves described it as “raw and earthy and animal and free”, but perhaps have missed the mark this time.
That being said, they had set a nearly impossible standard with Prelude to Ecstasy, and hope is far from lost for The Last Dinner Party to use their extremely promising potential to find their sound.
Comment
COMMENT: Google searches rise 450% for the 4b movement, but what is it?
A deep dive into the history of the 4B Movement.
American Democrats are now frantically running to find answers on Google after the recent election results.
The main answer they found was none other than the 4B movement, which originated in South Korea, stemming from a similar movement called “Escape the Corset”.
The idea of rejecting stereotypically “feminine” traits, dates back multiple millennials, with the oldest example of this idea being Aristophanes’ ancient Greek comedy play “Lysistrata”, performed in 411 BC, following a group of Greek women withholding sex, thus forcing men to end the Peloponnesian War.
This idea became the inspiration for South Korea’s Escape The Corset movement, which was popularised in 2017, with the western rise of the #MeToo movement, inspiring women to reject South Korea’s unrealistic beauty standards.
The standards had women and young girls spending incredible amounts on makeup, perfecting a 10-step skincare routine day in and day out, as well as taking an extra two hours out of their sleep to perfect this standard.
Now, in 2024, the Escape The Corset has been rebranded slightly to the ‘4B movement’.
The origins of the 4B movement can be traced back to the national protests over the filming of women using spy cameras and the publication and sharing of these videos.
With the name, 4B, stemming from ‘bi’ being the shorthanded word for ‘No’ in Korean, the 4b movement, relates to the 4 Nos.
The 4 Nos rules are: ‘bihon’, meaning the refusal of heterosexual marriage, ‘bichulsan’, the rejection of childbirth, ‘biyeonae’ is the denial of heterosexual dating, and the last no is ‘bisekseu’, the avoidance of heterosexual sexual relationships.
So, as explained in an article by The Cut: “The women of South Korea’s 4B Movement aren’t fighting the patriarchy-they’re leaving it behind entirely.”
So, with all of this in mind, what exactly does this have to do with the American elections?
With Trump’s presidency officially beginning on the 20th of January and 53% of females voting for Harris in comparison to Trump’s 45%, many American Democratic women are considering adopting this lifestyle.
With the highest Google searches being in states that all voted for the Democrats such as Washington DC, Colorado, Vermont and Minnesota.
Furthermore, the movement has also caught the attention online, with most taking to social media platforms such as, to express their inclination to join, believing in Fannie Lou Hammer’s quote: “Nobody’s free until everybody’s free.”
However, as we enter the final months of Biden’s presidency, it is unclear how many women will be making the sacrifice.
Comment
Southampton residents donate hundreds of artifacts to history society

Bitterne’s local history society is helping to preserve the history of Southampton and the surrounding suburbs by collecting thousands of artifacts from local residents who have donated much loved items to the society.
The formation of the society began in 1981, after the imminent construction of the Bitterne bypass.
Those who were keen to ensure the area’s heritage was not lost under the bulldozers, salvaged and donated items of interest, creating a museum of timely artifacts.
The society opens its doors six days a week (Monday to Friday) 10am-4pm and Saturday from 10-2pm for visitors to view and ask questions.
Manager and Chairperson of the society Ian Abrahams said:
“If we don’t preserve these artifacts and the information we hold in the museum, it will all be lost, and it would be a great shame.” he said.
Gary Cooper, a board member said:
“This is a wonderful museum we’ve got because it’s unique and it’s something a lot of places don’t have. It’s filled with all the memories and is an eyeopener for people.” he said.
The heritage centre is staffed by volunteer stewards who have many books, photographs, maps, and street directories dating from the 19th century onwards.
The volunteers have access to newsletters of local groups (including schools and churches) and computer databases, which can assist anyone searching for family who have lived in the area or those who just want to find out more about their city’s history.
The items that can be viewed in the museum range from – old shop signs, radios, telephones, cash registers, gas masks, tins, photographs, shoes, and much more.
Ian Abrahams said:
“People will donate all sorts of things that are not necessarily dedicated to Bitterne, but also items that hold the memories of those whose parents fought or lived through the war as most artifacts the history society receives, are passed on through many generations.”
When I visited the history museum, an older gentleman whom I interviewed, told me he resided in one of the local suburbs and came to donate old school photographs and historical books about Southampton.
The resident mentioned that it is becoming increasingly common for items of a certain age to be misplaced or even destroyed, where he worries about the “heritage and information” of the area of where he comes from, will not be remembered.
When asking as to why he decided to donate these items, he said:
“I am concerned that I have no one to pass these items onto, because I am on my own and I don’t want them to be destroyed.
“I know the society here do things, so I’m at rest knowing they will be preserved for a lot longer.”

-
Football9 years agoFootball – Winchester City vs Didcot Town
-
Community8 years agoWinnall community association renovated
-
Community8 years ago
Hampshire’s frontline services at risk
-
Hampshire8 years agoUniversity of Winchester Parking Trouble
-
Community8 years ago
Knight Bus unveiled at school
-
Community8 years ago‘Controversial’ new plans take shape in Eastleigh
-
Winchester News Online8 years ago#MiracleMissy Update
-
Bulletins7 years agoWINOL 20 November 2018
