Connect with us

Culture

REVIEW: Blood Brothers at Mayflower Theatre

Owen Noon

Published

on

Do you know the story of the Johnstone twins? Take a trip to the Merseyside as ‘Blood Brothers’ has returned to Southampton’s Mayflower Theatre once again. Willy Russell’s ‘Blood Brothers’ is a multi-award winning acclaimed musical, being one of just three musicals to have surpassed 10,000 performances on the West-End. You can definitely see how ‘Blood Brothers’ reached that milestone, and you can also definitely see how Bill Kenwright’s (producer) production got the title of the, “Standing Ovation Musical”. This is a story written as a musical, for musical lovers, and it brings people back time and time again. This isn’t your classic upbeat feel-good musical, but more of a modern tragedy – a modern day Shakespeare if you will – but this doesn’t mean it’s doom and gloom the whole time however.

This is actually my second time seeing this musical and not much has changed. I mean, if it’s not broken right? Original directors, Bob Tomson and Bill Kenwright, have clearly done a great job at staging this show in such a way to keep it engaging to the eye and energetic enough to allow the story to flow. The story from Russell is incredibly well written, and at the time of its first show back in 1981, I can imagine it getting just as much recognition as it still does today. With the story and direction not really changing from the original in 1981, certain parts of the scripting, direction and story have started to feel dated and of their time. This doesn’t take away from how well the story is written but it does make the musical feel old and almost like you’re watching a musical from the 80s or 90s. The type of set and lighting used along with the music also made me feel as if what I was watching was taken straight from the 80s/90s – but it matched the story. 

This heart-wrenching story is brought to life by a fantastic cast.

Blood Brothers’ is now actually studied in a lot of English school curriculums  so many people will be aware of the story. For those who don’t know the story however, without giving too much away, it’s a tale of two twins who are separated at birth only to grow up with living two completely different lives before meeting again with fateful consequences. This heart-wrenching story is brought to life by a fantastic cast that bring bits of childhood and angered energy (If you know you know). In particular, the twins mum, ‘Mrs Johnson’, is probably one of modern day theatres power-house roles. Playing her is Niki Colwell Evans and she was sensational. Her performance was so moving and you could tell even though her characters circumstances were extreme, the audience was resonating with her every move. As for her voice, she stole the show with that; ‘Tell Me It’s Not True’ was definitely well worth the wait, and I think her tears tell you how much that meant to her as well. Incredible! 

Playing the twins from the age of “seven nearly eight” right the way throughout their lives were Sean Jones as the less fortunate ‘Mickey’, and Joe Sleight as the more fortunate ‘Eddie’ (if thats the best way to describe them?). Sean, from the moment he stepped out as that seven year old Scouse boy was brilliant. His comedic timing was spot on and you actually started to forget the he was an adult playing a child. On the contrast, as he gets into his adult years, his performance only heightens. Such a convincing and passionate performance. Much the same can be said with Joe. The bond that these two share on stage really makes you believe that they’re the best of friends. The comedy Joe uses is different from Sean, as he’s not the same Scouse little boy, but instead posh and upper class; which he delivers to perfection. Russell has written to these differences perfectly. Overseeing the whole show is Scott Anson as the ‘Narrator’, who does a fantastic job at being almost the devil figure through song and rhyme. I also just need to mention Sarah Jane Buckley as ‘Mrs Lyons’ because her performance as the so called ‘bad guy’ was spine chilling. I wish I could write a line or two for every individual cast member, but they all brought their own little quirks to their roles and none of it went unnoticed – superb!  

When it comes to the set, it does feel like a set for a show from the 90s but I guess thats exactly what it is. In the same way, it feels dated with the static side houses being there throughout the performance, and the cheesy backdrops of either the city or countryside. However it is still grand like you would expect from a West-End show. The flats of a new house or certain pieces of scenery that fly in do just enough to make you feel as if you’re somewhere new. The lights were the particular thing that made this feel like an older production. There was lots of relying on spotlights, with your standard red and blues also highly used. I did like the certain light effects when it came to setting the scene, for example in the prison. The whole lighting output was actually more complex than it seemed but still with that dated vibe which I guess is sticking with the theme of the show. 

Onto the music. With a musical of its stature, some of the songs off the soundtrack have understandably become very well known in the theatre world. Arguably the most famous of which I have already mentioned, ‘Tell Me It’s Not True’, but also ’Marilyn Monroe’ cannot be forgotten. Having a soundtrack and score played out by a live band is a must for big musicals. Hearing the ‘Blood Brothers’ band led by Matt Malone, play this powerful, rocky, and emotional score was perfect. They were the perfect accompaniment to Russell’s lyrics – no matter how repetitive they may be. This musical is extremely repetitive in both its script and songs, but especially in its songs. Musicals such as ‘Les Misérables’ and ‘Hamilton’ also use a lot of repetition but they hide it very intricately and make it part of linking the story. ‘Blood Brothers’ is far more blatant with its repetition. It borders on almost too much, but just be prepared to hear lots about ‘Marilyn Monroe’ and ‘the devil having your number’. 

I don’t think I’ve seen a full theatre standing ovation for a very long time.

As I mentioned briefly, there are no children in this cast, it is all adults. This means for the majority of the show, we do see adults fooling around as juveniles on stage. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, its just not everybody’s thing. This cast seems to be particularly good at finding the line of making their performances not too jarring to watch. I also mentioned that a lot of the language and story themes are very dated. This comes in the form of certain jokes that are used, or even pieces of physical comedy/harm. I can understand that in the day, these would have been totally acceptable but times have changed. As well as being greeted by a laugh, a lot of them were also greeted with what I can only describe as a moment of cringe. Unfortunately, with the story being set when it is and where it is, I don’t see how these could really be changed and just removing them would leave a hole. With the recent theatre news surrounding trigger warnings, I think it also right to note that this is a musical that 100% should have trigger warnings! There are so many things in this musical that had me thinking, “This would not run in a new musical”. 

As for the pace of the show, the first act did begin to drag. It seemed as if stuff was happening but we weren’t really going anywhere, both physically and within the story. I don’t think this was helped by the permanent side housing that was always in view. I’m happy to say that the second act had a much better pace, with the story moving along and actually going somewhere as well. ‘Blood Brothers’ is a musical with an incredibly well written story and you can see why it has won the awards it has. It is very dated and of it’s time now, but I think if you were to change it – it would never be the same. This is what it is and it’s proud of that. It’s a musical that leaves you literally standing on your feet, I don’t think I’ve seen a full theatre standing ovation for a very long time – the perfect proof for the “Standing Ovation Musical”. ‘Blood Brothers’ is a semi-modern musical that’s now a certified classic, but this doesn’t mean it’s perfect and it does have it’s flaws. These flaws could be a major deterrent for a lot of people but I still think that if you can contextualise these, it’s definitely worth a watch. ‘Blood Brothers’ is showing at Mayflower theatre until 2nd March before continuing on its UK tour and I wish all of the cast and crew the best of luck going forwards. 

Continue Reading

Culture

Where confidence takes centre stage: How theatre transforms

Avatar

Published

on

Performing arts education isn’t just about learning to act, dance, or sing – it’s vital in developing many young people’s confidence and self-expression.

In a digital age where young people are spending more time on their devices than ever before, theatre education provides lifelong skills like communication, resilience and teamwork.  

I caught up with some of the students at Artisan Theatre School, a Hampshire based youth theatre club, to see if this rings true.  

Ben, 18, said his time at theatre school has “helped develop people skills” and made him “a more confident person”.

He urged other young people to “get involved and enjoy it!”

Daniel, 17, shared a similar sentiment saying his “confidence has grown a lot”.

Theatre education can open a whole world of new opportunities for young people, giving them the space to discover their talents and explore future career paths.

Lucy, 17, has attended Artisan Theatre School for nine years and said: “I want to be a performer in some capacity.”

She added: “That’s my dream because of Artisan.”  

Emma, a singing teacher at the school, said performing arts education is “beneficial to anyone,” not just those pursuing it professionally.

She added it can be especially valuable for children with SEN, helping them build confidence, improve communication, and “come out of their shell” in a supportive environment. 

Unfortunately, despite its benefits, arts education is not guaranteed for every young person.

Cuts to funding over the last decade has had a significant impact, limiting access to creative learning opportunities.

The Cultural Learning Alliance’s 2025 report reveals a 42% decrease in Creative Arts based GCSE entries since 2010, and a 27% decline in the number of Arts teachers.  

Sam Blackwell, principal and founder of Artisan Theatre School, said arts education is “really important” and that “they don’t do enough of it in schools”.

She explained that her vision in creating the school was to “give back more to kids and get them being confident”.

To help fill the gaps left by reduced arts provision in schools, Sam plans to introduce additional classes and offer increased opportunities for her students to learn from industry professionals.

Continue Reading

Culture

And we all keep dancing for it can’t get any worse (90s/00s)

Avatar

Published

on

The Shakespearean nature of Tony Blair’s time as Prime Minister is something that had never been seen and his obsession with “the spin” that had won him the 1997 election and made him one of the most popular prime ministers when entering office.

With large proportions of the public optimistic for his premiership incoming.

A fall from grace would ensue much like Macbeth.

It would be cruel and untrue to reflect on Tony Blair’s premiership to say that it was a complete failure, especially as many still see him as one of the best PMs the UK has ever had.

Since one of the biggest landslides in UK election history in 1997, he was able to push through many socialist policies without much of a hassle: inflation was low, crime was down by a third, children were achieving some of their highest results ever in school, thousands more students were going to university, a million pensioners and three million children had been taken out of poverty, the quality of the air, beaches, and drinking water was as clean as before the industrial revolution.

However 9/11 changed everything. The era of youthful optimism and rebellion has been replaced by what a lot of thinkers call post-post modernism.

At site Zero, George Bush claimed that “those who are responsible must be brought to justice.”

He outlined Cuba, Iran, Libya, Syria, North Korea and most importantly Iraq.

Once the troops stepped into Iraq, it was the start of a domino effect that quickly decimated Blair’s time as PM.

Unlike Kosovo and Sierra Leone, Britain’s involvement in Iraq did not have the public’s support.

In his book The Prime Ministers, Steve Richards remarks that Tony Blair had not assumed any cabinet position in the lead up to his premiership and asks:”What if Blair had been foreign secretary? at least he would’ve seen, and interpreted intelligence – an explosively contentious issue in the run-up to the Iraq War.”

And then, the day after London had been announced as the host of the 2012 Olympics, on the 6th of July 2005, 7/7 happened.

Four terrorists detonated bombs on public transport – 52 killed and 784 were injured.

When times get tougher and life gets sadder, what do people do? Dance to forget

Prince William and Kate were leaving a Chelsea nightclub at 3am, Prince Harry was partying with Kanye West and getting into a scuffle with photographers at 4am.

The 2000s club scene was here and everyone was taking part; it was loud, it was abrasive, and it was here to stay.

Since the introduction of the stifling 1994 Criminal Justice Act, which is considered to have brought the illegal rave era largely to a close, “free parties” were the new get-around of the law: Student clubs offering “buy one, get three free” on alcopops and 50p doubles for an hour.

Halls bars were £1.20 a pint. Artists like LCD Soundsystem, Missy Elliot and Rihanna began their rise to fame with dirty, booming soundscapes that captured the drug-fuelled atmosphere of clubs as everyone dances to a beat that never seems to end, drenched in sweat.


Films like Trainspotting capture the allure of 2000s clubbing but the grim reality, drugs have found their way into the club scene.

Much like the Oasis album Standing on the Shoulder of Giants is described as Oasis’ “come down album”, the 2000s was a comedown era of clubbing.

The times were sad, but the music got louder?

As David Cameron’s government entered Number 10 Downing Street in 2010 and ushered in 14 years of austerity, where exactly would clubbing culture go with almost all clubs closing….

Continue Reading

Culture

REVIEW: Sigrid – There’s Always More That I Could Say

Matt Hays

Published

on

There's Always More That I Could Say album cover - used under Fair Dealing, Review

2 out of 5 stars

A disappointing third album filled with negativity

In all honesty, I was late to Sigrid’s party. 

I started following the Norwegian pop star in 2023 when she had already released two albums and completed a slew of EPs and international tours. 

In no time at all, I was captivated by her rasping tones, funky rhythms, and cool electronic synths. 

When news broke that her third album would be releasing on 24 October, it was no surprise to find myself listening and assessing it… 

Jellyfish is the first single and the most lighthearted.  I like it. 

It’s a nice story about two people meeting at a dance and kindling a relationship. 

Sigrid sings in a syncopated rhythm, giving a jazzy tone to the tune. 

For the first time in her career, she includes a flute. 

Cold, gritty, grim

It plays a flourish at the beginning but I can’t hear it throughout the rest of the track.  It would be good to hear more of the flute in future. 

Fort Knox is single number two.  As the name suggests, this is a cold, gritty, grim song about a woman betrayed by her man. 

This betrayal cuts so deep that she has retreated into her shell to “lock my love up in… Fort Knox”. 

I enjoyed the dramatic, dark nature here, especially the war cry chorus throughout the song.

Towards the end, you would think the song has finished before it plays one more crescendo of strings to cap things off.  I thought that was unnecessary.   

The third single, Two Years, is written from the perspective of the woman’s boyfriend, another new departure for Sigrid. 

He has been chasing for that exact period of time.  It’s a cheery song with a strong beat, despite the desperate lyrics like: “What are you running from? / Why did you let me go?”   

I’ll Always Be Your Girl is another sad song of frustration and heartache caused by a rowdy, hot-headed partner. 

It is sung very well, especially the pleading chorus line, and the drum-guitar combination gives me something to nod along to.   

Unconventional energy

Do It Again is the most unremarkable song on the album. 

There is a good guitar and drum track, however the story again is quite predictable for Sigrid (being tempted to rekindle on old flame relationship).   

Kiss The Sky returns to more unconventional energy which is great. 

A lovely fade into the track leads into the main verses. 

This time, Sigrid is speaking her verses with a distorted effect rather than singing them.  It sounds good and complements her natural raspiness. 

A strong guitar riff carries us through the bridge.  The electronic synths make this seem like a 1980s dance track. 

It’s only the lyrics that make this song a story of disappointment between lovers.   

There is sexual innuendo in Hush, Baby, Hurry Slowly.

You could interpret it as a man and woman deciding whether to move forward with their relationship. 

You could see it as partners deciding whether to have sex or not. 

As a result, it’s an interesting song and makes you listen to try and work it out. 

The structure shakes things up by starting with the chorus fading in. 

The song ends with the melody slowing down and lowering in pitch, reflecting the title in musical terms.  

The title track is the obligatory solo piano song.  

Sigrid has had at least one piano focused song in all albums.  

This is the most beautiful song in the album, featuring solo piano and a nice resonance on the voice.  

The lyrics still contain tensions between people, like “giving…my worst” as a girlfriend.

Nevertheless, this is my favourite song from this year’s collection.   

The penultimate track is also the longest in the album.  

Have You Heard This Song Before picks up the energy from the previous song with a predictable but welcome mix of drums and synths.  

The lyrics are pretty hopeful in tone about wanting to spend time with your partner.  This is the most positive track on the album.   

The last song, Eternal Sunshine, is a conventional finale song.  

It has a regular beat and instrumentation.  

It is another song built out of frustration with a partner – she wants to “drink” him out of her mind.  

It would have been nice to have something different to end on – maybe a different topic.   

This is the shortest album Sigrid has released.  That is disappointing. 

There are 10 songs in only 31 minutes.  

I would have expected the usual 12 tracks or more. 

The previous albums managed it fine.  

Sucker Punch (2019) and How To Let Go (2022) contained 12 songs.  The Special Edition of How To Let Go added 15 songs on top of the originals.  

This album differs from the last two in that every song but one is constantly loud, energetic, and pumping.  

I would have preferred more balance between softer and pounding songs.   

How To Let Go had more positivity in it, such as singing in a taxi, body-confidence in the mirror and making the most of life. 

This album has replaced that with disappointment and frustration.  

It is the album with the most “explicit” songs – never before have we had an album with so much swearing.  

I hope that is toned down in future.   

Here’s hoping that the next album is more positive, unconventional and creative.  

Perhaps that will come out in three years, like the others.  

There’s always more that Sigrid could say (sorry, that was a terrible joke).  

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.