Winchester News Online
REVIEW: Cluedo 2: The Next Chapter at Mayflower Theatre

Do you know whodunit? ‘Cluedo 2: The New Chapter’ has set itself up on the Mayflower Theatre’s stage and it is exactly how you would imagine a giant board-game in the flesh. Following the huge success of ‘Cluedo’, the first hilarious whodunnit, ‘Cluedo 2’ is back with a brand-new story, house, suspects, and well… plenty of bodies (Shhh). Usually we’re talking about a book to stage adaptation, but this week we’re talking about a board-game to stage adaptation. Yes, this is obviously based on the classic family board-game, but it is also based on the Paramount Pictures motion picture ‘Clue’. In all honesty I was actually unaware that Cluedo had already been made into a movie, but I wasn’t surprised to find out at all. ‘Cluedo 2’ was written by BAFTA award winners Maurice Gran and Laurence Marks, and directed by Mark Bell (who has a very impressive back catalog: ‘The Play That Goes Wrong’). If you have ever played the game before, the layout of this play will come as no surprise. Likewise, if you have ever read an Agatha Christie novel, you will have some sort of idea of how the play will pan out. However, how does this work as a comedy? And will it work on the stage?
I think the answer to that question is ultimately yes. It does work on the stage, and it does work as a comedy. But should they have maybe stopped after the success of the first ‘Cluedo’? Don’t get me wrong, I was thoroughly entertained, and I was laughing at points throughout the show. I just think that maybe some of the jokes/writing got lost and didn’t land as well as I think they should have. What the writers had to do can’t have been an easy job however. Trying to build on the success and expectation of the first ‘Cluedo’, whilst making the story new and exciting, but keeping with the recognisable characters and locations of what makes Cluedo, Cluedo – that’s definitely not an easy task. The direction and movement of the show was brilliant (we’ll get into more of this later), but it did feel like it was living in the shadows of shows like ‘The Play That Goes Wrong’. The movement is very similar (thank you Mark Bell), but the comedy was just slightly off.
‘Cluedo 2’ was funny and stunning to watch.
This time round its the 1960s and the story is based around rock ’n’ roll legend Rick Black, who assembles a group of people to come to Graveny Manor and listen to his latest album. That is all until the bodies start piling up and mystery’s and secrets start pouring out…
The cast had to be energetic and really bring their A-game, and I think that’s exactly what they did. It’s not a huge cast, but I always think that acting in a play is much harder than acting in a musical at times. This is because you now can’t rely on songs/music to grab the audiences attention, or to change the pace of what is going on. This is why a lot of people tend to use the word boring when describing plays. Boring is definitely not a word I would use to describe ‘Cluedo 2’. There wasn’t one moment that I thought the play started to drag, and the pace of the show was really good. In fact the pace of the show may have been too fast at times – possibly why a few of the jokes/lines failed to land?
As I said earlier, the whole cast brought the energy, and all of them gave a really strong collaborative performance. There were a couple of stand out performers that really helped elevate the show as well. Dawn Buckland as ‘Mrs White’ was fantastic throughout. From the very first time she stepped onto that stage, through to the very end, I thought her performance was full and quite frankly brilliant. Liam Horrigan as ‘Rick Black & Others’ was just hilarious. The ability to play multiple characters and them all be completely separate from each other is seriously impressive. To get laughs from all of these characters as well, well played! The best type of acting, is when you forget that you’re watching somebody pretend to be somebody else. This is exactly what Hannah Boyce and Jack Bennett did as they grew into their roles of ‘Mrs Peacock’ and ‘Wadsworth’ (Is he a butler?) throughout the play. The cast were at their very best when they were all collaborating together, I was seriously impressed by some of their movement scenes! Bravo!

When it comes to the set, before the show started I wasn’t too hopeful in all honesty. As you walk into the auditorium, you see the manor at the back of the stage on top of a Cluedo board, with the outlines of a Cluedo board framing the stage, and lots of black boarding. From seeing this, I was worried that ‘this’ was going to be the whole set. I’m incredibly happy to say that this was not the case however. The set was so creative. I loved the way that you could be seamlessly transported from one iconic room to the next just via few fly downs and the seamless movement from the cast. The cast would do all of the scene changes and it made what could’ve been quite a stale play, into an incredibly dynamic one.
A big highlight that I’m taking from ‘Cluedo 2’ is the way they portrayed moving from room to room around the house. Moving set is one task, but moving characters whilst they’re all still on stage is even harder. Yet here it was seamless. The only way I can describe it is almost Scooby-Doo-esc. Moving on the spot whilst others moved the set to make it seem like they were travelling, to going off on one side of the stage and instantly appearing the other. And the ‘Scooby-Doo’ style fit in with the 60s theme perfectly. Seriously impressive!
Seriously impressive!
The lighting was also incredibly clever and effective. The board at the back of the stage would light up in all different colours, and then one of the rooms would be spotlit depicting what room the current scene was taking place in. I loved this detail so much. The lights from room to room were designed fantastically and really helped immerse where you were meant to be as well. The music that would play throughout the play at times was very 60s, not to mention the music in the auditorium during the interval and pre-show.
Overall ‘Cluedo 2’ was very fun. It was funny, it was stunning to watch at times, and it did its job as a whodunnit – it made you think whodunnit, then change who you thought did it, then change that once again. Yes I definitely think it could’ve been funnier and it’s a shame that not all of the jokes landed, some of them I worry you had to think about too much. Or the timing was just slightly off, but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t funny. The play is marketed for anyone from 8-80 years old, however I don’t think this is a play perfectly suited for kids. It’s extremely fast paced, and a lot of the jokes are aimed towards adults – if not directly then indirectly through innuendo. Yes it does still feature silly slapstick comedy, but it’s more to the Monty Python/Blackadder slapstick over pantomime slapstick for example. This doesn’t mean kids shouldn’t see this show, I just think that its more aimed towards an adult audience in both script and direction.
If you’re a fan of whodunnits, detective comedies, or just of the board-game in general – you will love this play. I think it should also be noted that you don’t need to see the first ‘Cluedo’ to understand what happens in ‘Cluedo 2’. ‘Cluedo 2: The New Chapter’ is in Southampton until June 23rd before continuing on its big UK tour. I wish all the cast and crew the best of luck on their exciting run! Go and see if you can work out whodunnit…
Winchester News Online
Greenham Common holds half marathon in aid of baby charity

On Sunday, Run Forest Run organised a half marathon alongside a 10k run, canicross route and a kids race all having the goal of raising money for the charity New life who help provide essential and specialized equipment for neonatal units helping premature and seriously ill babies survive and live their life.
New Life was launched by Trevor Goodall 30 years ago after his two sons died after they were born underweight.
Since then the charity has raised more than £2m.
The half marathon, which was making its second appearance on the common, was won by Lawrence Gillard in a time of 1:26:46.
In the 10k ,out of 99 runners, Danny Hawkins came out on top completing the route in just over 34 minutes and with their furry companion in the canicross, Mark Chance crossed the line first in 42:52.
The course passed the control towers and bunkers which were previously used in the Cold War.
The nearby airfield was previously used as a filming location for some Star Wars films as well as Fast and Furious.
It wasn’t only the other runners they were racing against but having to navigate cattle and herds around the area.
One of the founders of Run Forest Run, Mark Hayes said: “We’ve got six events planned for next year and possibly two others.
“We had about 400 runners last year, and raised around £22,000 and we always have New life special care babies as our primary charity.”
Sport
Billie Jean King – Battle of the Sexes – 1973

The year was 1973. The lights of the Houston Astrodome glared down on a tennis court that had become more than just a playing field — it was a stage for a cultural revolution.
Cameras flashed, tension buzzed in the air, and two players stepped onto the court — one a confident showman, the other a determined trailblaser carrying the hopes of millions.
As the first serve sliced through the air on that September evening, millions around the world weren’t just watching a tennis match — they were witnessing a fight for equality, respect, and change.
Billie Jean King is a legendary American tennis champion and advocate for gender equality whose career and impact extends far beyond the court.
With 39 Grand Slams titles and a historic victory in 1973, “Battle of the Sexes” match, she not only proved her athletic ability but also challenged stereotypes about women within the world of sport.
As a founder of the Women’s Tennis Association and a leader behind equal prize money, King became a powerful force for fairness and inclusion, later emerging as a voice for LGBTQ+ rights.
Her legacy as both a world class athlete and a fearless activist changed the game for generations to come.
The “Battle of the Sexes” was a famous match, between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs, a former men’s champion who was adamant that men were superior athletes.
The match was played in front of more than 30,000 fans at the Houston Astrodome and watched by roughly 90 million people worldwide, the event was a both a sporting spectacle and a major milestone in the fight for gender equality.
Billie Jean King defeated Riggs in straight sets (6-4, 6-3, 6-3), this proved that women could compete in the highest level which inspired greater respect and opportunities for female athletes around the world.
The event’s impact was immediate. Women’s tennis surged in popularity, drawing new audiences, sponsorships, and media coverage. King used the momentum to push for lasting change.
This helped the US Open to become the first major tournament to offer equal pay. Her win also empowered a new generation of female athletes to come out and code and what was rightfully theirs.
More than five decades later, the Battle of the Sexes remains a cultural milestone.
It symbolised more than just a tennis match, it was a statement about equality, perseverance, and the power of sport to challenge societal norms.
Culture
Review of The Roses 2025

If something looks perfect from the outside does it mean it actually is?
That’s the concept that director Jay Roach brings to life in the new movie The Roses released in August 2025.
The Roses is a reimagining of the 1989 film The War of the Roses which was originally based on Warren Adler’s 1981 novel.
Although unlike the novel the characters instead are shown to struggle with their different careers either rising or falling.
It has been adapted, in my opinion, to make it resonate with women a lot more as in both the novel and first film the women were stay at home mothers who felt unsatisfied.
This appears to be one of the main reasons for the divorces with Barbara (Kathleen Turner) eventually turning to a catering business.
However, within the new modernised version Ivy’s (Olivia Colman) successful career is a point of contempt for Theo (Benedict Cumberbatch).
While it starts off with a more realistic depiction of parents struggling with the loss of a career and a start of a new one, it slowly divulges itself away from the typical divorcee movie.
I watched this movie at the Everyman (luxury I know!) and the grip it had on me as an audience member was outstanding.
With the selection of actors involved in this movie it’s no surprise that there is a mix of comedy and drama making it a satirical black comedy.
While it was delightful to watch, I feel that some audience members might criticise the realism of the movie.
Yet I go to the cinema to be transported from real life so the mix of realism and shock factor was highly entertaining.
A contrasting mix of comedy and darkness
The performances from the actors was exactly what the movie needed.
The chemistry, or lack thereof, between Colman and Cumberbatch was so believable that you would think that they were married in real life.
Their delivery of both the comedy and the rage was again so believable that it sucked me as the audience into what was the “dirty laundry” of their personal lives.
With a supporting cast including Andy Samberg, Allison Janney and others their characters mostly brought the comedy relief needed in to break the movie up.
They also gave us a contrast to the main relationship being shown which helped us recognise how some of the actions were exaggerated for our benefit.
However, some critics online have noted that while it is undeniably a satirical dark comedy, the dark comedy seemed to be held back some times, therefore not always giving it the edge it needed.
I think that for a 15 certificate movie it had just the right amount to stretch over its wide audience.
Another criticism that The Roses received was that the contrast between the comedy and cruelty was sometimes so abrupt that it didn’t hit as hard as it could have.
At some points the comedy seemed out of place which almost gave the film a sort of jarring feel as they changed between the emotions.
The ending is ambiguous which can have mixed reactions from the audience.
Some may like to have the movie tied up neatly at the end whereas others like that they can believe what they want to believe.
I am the latter in the case of this movie as I enjoyed the fact that I could believe either the more macabre ending or not.
To me the ending, without giving any spoilers, had me on the edge of my seat with a real 360 turn.
Again it had the perfect amount of shock factor and comedy which highlighted the overall tone throughout.
I felt that it drew the entire film together nicely especially with the ending performance from Coleman and Cumberbatch.
-
Football9 years ago
Football – Winchester City vs Didcot Town
-
Community8 years ago
Winnall community association renovated
-
Community8 years ago
Hampshire’s frontline services at risk
-
Hampshire8 years ago
University of Winchester Parking Trouble
-
Community8 years ago
Knight Bus unveiled at school
-
Community8 years ago
‘Controversial’ new plans take shape in Eastleigh
-
Winchester News Online8 years ago
#MiracleMissy Update
-
Bulletins7 years ago
WINOL 20 November 2018