Culture
REVIEW: Jesus Christ Superstar at Mayflower Theatre
JESUS CHRIST – SUPERSTAR! Yep I sung it too! At Mayflower Theatre this week, perfectly timed for Easter, is the critically acclaimed ‘Jesus Christ Superstar’ – back from the dead if you will. This revived production started in 2017 with two sold out runs at Regent’s Park Open Air Theatre, before taking over North America (again) with a tour that is still ongoing. This is an updated, slightly modernised version of Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice’s original concert turned Broadway musical smash-hit, and its not hard to see why it has such raving reviews and accolades. If you’re not aware of the story, you are more than definitely aware of ‘Superstar’s’ title tune (as sung above…); but for those of you unaware, the story takes us through the last few weeks of Jesus Christ’s life, seen through the eyes of Judas.
This production is all about the music! As it was originally written as an album and later turned into a musical production – the new design and direction from Tom Scutt (designer) and Timothy Sheader (director), lends itself perfectly to not only the story but also the music style. A lot of the modernisation comes from the set, design and costume (which we’ll get onto a little bit later), but this particular production of ‘Superstar’ has everything that you’d expect from an Olivier Award winner (Best Musical Revival). The coherence between Drew McOnie’s wonderful choreography, with the new design elements and powerful vocals/instrumentals, all give this musical the ‘Rock-Opera’ vibe. What I particularly liked was the fact that you couldn’t tell that this musical is over 50 years old. Granted this version isn’t 50 years old, but the music and story is – and it felt as if it could’ve been written yesterday. Although they both more than likely took some inspiration from the original, this version of ‘Superstar’ was like the perfect modernised love-child of ‘Les Misérables’ and ‘Hamilton’.
The raw emotion in his performance was stunning.
This cast was superb! Firstly I think I need to mention the ensemble. The energy in dance and movement took this performance to a whole new dimension. Their movements were strong and gave an extra edge to the story by adding physical emotion into the mix. Brilliant from all them! We also HAVE to mention the main man!Playing ‘Jesus’ tonight was understudy, Luke Street. He was phenomenal! His voice had the perfect rock tone and his rendition of ‘Gethsemane’ was flawless. The raw emotion in his performance was stunning. Keeping on the trend of incredible voices, Hannah Richardson as ‘Mary’ was again phenomenal. In particular ‘Everything’s Alright’, which also included Shem Omari James as ‘Judas’, was beautifully sang from all three of them. Shem’s voice also lent itself perfectly to the narrative of the story, like he was singing to the audience and telling them what was happening/what he was thinking. Although he may not be involved for too long, ‘Herod’ played tonight by Timo Tatzber, completely switched up the pace of the musical, and got a huge reception. Overall, this cast clearly has lots of talent and they showcased that – they sparkled out there tonight, and that was way before the glitter! (if you know you know).

When it comes to set and design, as I mentioned earlier – this is really something that has made this production that much better. The set itself is modernistic industrial minimalism, with iron pillars making up the back of the staging where the band sits (will also touch on this later). In the centre of the stage is a cut out crucifix on the backdrop with a grated, giant, three dimensional crucifix on a slant centre stage. This is used as a runway at times, and the levels of the set at the back for characters to run up and down on is very nice in adding layers to what you’re looking at. The little modernised touches of cables and wires being used as bits of symbolism and replacements as restraints was also a nice oxymoron from the story to modern times. The costumes were also on this same line as well. Minimalist and modern but that’s all they needed to be. The lighting was a mixture of minimalist – to rock concert. There was no in-between. I particularly loved the way it looked like the cast would just appear from under the crucifix because of the way the lights were formed. Incredibly effective!
You’re expecting to see a Broadway show, and that’s exactly what you get.
To talk about the music, I don’t think there’s too much that can be said. It’s an album that’s gone gold and platinum, and you can see why. It’s not really surprising coming from the minds of theatre royalty. The live band fronted by Michael Riley smashed it tonight. Live music always adds so much more to musical theatre, and when its basically a rock concert on stage – even better. I also love it when we have actors that can play instruments live on stage. It not only showcases the incredible performers further, but I think in ‘Superstar’s’ case, it pays a nice homage to when this used to just be a touring concert. The same can be said in the way handheld microphones are used – its something new and fresh to see in a current musical. The guitar solos were straight from Slash’s songbook, and there were so many different styles of music – including the sax solo! You can definitely see why this was instantly so popular in the 70s. Rock music was at its high point. To make another similarity to modern day, ‘Hamilton’ has done the exact same thing in todays age. Rock is to ‘Jesus Christ Superstar’, what rap is to ‘Hamilton’.
Overall, the production value of this musical is certainly something that doesn’t disappoint. You’re expecting to see a Broadway show, and that’s exactly what you get. It’s again collaborative between multiple different art forms. By having the band on the stage, they now become a character. I don’t think enough has been said about the dance either. So much is happening, and when the ensemble go from sequenced dance individually to in unison it looks so clean. When they bring out different crucifixes that light up or pour glitter, it again is something very simple that has a very big pay off. A scene that I can recall instantly would be the last supper, because that’s exactly what it represented. If you were to walk in without context to what was going on, you’d know exactly what it was. Extremely clever direction. At the point when Jesus gets crucified I knew what was coming, but I wasn’t prepared for the atmosphere to get as dark as it did. The effect of having him hanging there with a light shining through him, left a silhouette which was exceedingly powerful. The silence that followed this was potentially the longest that I have ever witnessed in a theatre.
From silence to a standing ovation roar, ‘Jesus Christ Superstar’ got exactly what it deserved. I feel like I could talk on and on about this particular production, but what fun is reading about it when you could go and see it yourself? (Which you definitely should do!). I remember I always used to think that this musical was going to be heavily religious which put me off previously. However, if I could just ask you to go and listen to the ‘Overture’ from the album – it may be enough to get you into the theatre like it was with me. ‘Jesus Christ Superstar’ is at Mayflower Theatre until Saturday 30th March before carrying on, on its UK tour. There may be some cast changes with Julian Clary playing ‘Herod’ from Thursday-Saturday. I’m sure this whole company is going to continue to perform to the high standards that gained this musical revival its impressive reputation, and I wish them all the luck as they move forward.
Culture
Hampstead movie review
With the passing of Diane Keaton I decided that I would watch some of her old work.
I chose to watch the 2017 movie Hampstead as it seemed to be quite a good representation of her acting skills.
It is based loosely (trying not to give the plot away, however it did come out eight years ago!) on Harry Hallowes real life, he used to live on a plot in Hampstead Heath and then managed to claim rights on it.
One of the best parts of this movie was the chemistry between Diane Keaton and Brendan Gleeson.
It felt natural and not strained which definitely made it more believable for me.
Their chemistry also helped make their characters seem more natural making their performance that much better.
I’m not one who normally enjoys romantic (some may say sappy) movies but the mixture of romance and social justice themes in this movie made it not too uncomfortable.
It gives the audience a feel-good time with us feeling like we are doing something right, due to us deciding that Gleeson’s character is right.
It made me feel like I was standing up for the underdog and marginalised communities.
I found it quite clever how they made it an easy movie to watch, not too many sad themes, while also fitting in the themes of community and standing up for the right thing.
I would say that if you are feeling a bit down then this would be a very good movie too watch.
A perfect movie for a light matinee
As a nature person, the setting of this film was spectacular.
I really liked the idea of an expanse of nature so close to a city.
It creates a very picturesque backdrop for the movie which further added to the warmthness portrayed throughout the movie.
I especially liked where Keaton’s character ended up living in the end.
However, as always there are critics.
With this movie one of the big critiques was that the story was very predictable and followed the same formula that a lot of other romance movies used.
There was just too many cliches which made it painful for the audience to witness again and due to the lack of surprises it was not the most engaging film to watch.
This goes hand in hand with the fact that the characters where more broad and stereotypical than they should have been.
The other big critique from this movie was that people thought it lacked tone and depth, saying that while it did touch on different societal problems such as eviction, class divide and property divide it didn’t pronounce it enough.
It felt a bit like dipping one toe into the water of the problems.
While I do agree that it didn’t delve deep into the problems society faces, I didn’t think that was what the movie was about or what the directors were trying to get across to the audience.
I believe that it was simply highlighting these issues in an easy to understand way.
Culture
Are Max Martin and Shellback the downfall of Taylor Swift’s latest album?
The release of Taylor Swift’s 12th LP, The Life of a Showgirl, has been met with divided opinions.
Although a record breaking 2.7m albums were sold on the first day of release, not all these buyers are satisfied.
It might be a push to say the majority are. Online, listeners argue this album is “millennial cringe” and that Swift is showing her “true capitalist self”.
Alongside Swift herself, Max Martin and Shellback produced the album.
Long-time collaborators, they previously helped define 1989 and Reputation. But this marks the first time the trio have exclusively worked together.
1989 and Reputation catapulted Swift to global pop fame.
Through hits such as Blank Space, Shake it Off and Getaway Car, Martin and Shellback provided Swift a clean break from her country roots, throwing her into the deep end of mainstream pop.
However, a decade later the formula feels tired.
So why has The Life of a Showgirl fallen so flat?
Following Swift’s last album The Tortured Poets Department, a lyrically rich 31 song LP radiating heartbreak and introspection, the synthetic glitz and glamour of Showgirl feel false.
In a post-Folklore world, where Swift proved her strength as a lyricist with the help of producer Jack Antonoff, the return to maximalism and Martin-Shellback production feels hollow.
With the loss of Antonoff and the return of Martin and Shellback, has Swift lost the reflective heart of her songwriting?
That’s not to say Showgirl is without merit.
Its production is faultless, and the album follows a clear and fluid theme.
But perhaps that’s the problem. In collaborating solely with Martin and Shellback, Swift may have created her most technically accomplished album but her least emotionally convincing one.
Whether this is a misstep or the purpose of the album remains to be seen.
But the reception of The Life of a Showgirl questions the path Swift is on.
Now the world dominating Eras Tour is over, is the peak of Swift’s career over too?
Culture
The End of Strictly Come Dancing as we know it?
We all know Strictly Come Dancing as one of the most popular prime time slots on a Saturday night.
But could this be the end of Strictly as we know it?
The BBCs show has struggled recently with allegations of bullying and inappropriate behaviour, but now Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman have released a joint statement to say they are passing the sparkly button on at the end of this series.
Their Instagram statement in full:
We have loved working as a duo and hosting Strictly has been an absolute dream. We were always going to leave together and now feels like the right time. We will have the greatest rest of this amazing series and we just want to say an enormous thank you to the BBC and to every single person who works on the show. They’re the most brilliant team and we’ll miss them every day. We will cry when we say the last “keep dancing” but we will continue to say it to each other. Just possibly in tracksuit bottoms at home while holding some pizza.
Tess & Claud
Following their joint statement they each released their own statements as a follow up.
Tess Daly’s statement in full:
After 21 unforgettable years, the time has come to say goodbye to Strictly Come Dancing. It’s hard to put into words what this show has meant to me, so here goes… Strictly has been more than just a television programme. It’s felt like having a third child, a second family, and a huge part of my life since that very first show back in 2004. I knew then it was something special, but I could never have imagined the magic it would bring.
Strictly has always been about joy, celebration, and bringing people together – and I’m so proud to have played a small part in something that continues to mean so much to so many.
From that very first series, I had the great honour of standing alongside the incomparable Sit Bruce Forsyth.
Brucie set the tine for everything that Strictly became: warmth, wit, connection, and pure showbiz magic.
I have always been in awe of our superbly talented professional dancers, our magnificent judges, and all the celebrities who have taken part. I absolutely adore our brilliant crew – every single member of the Strictly team who have worked tirelessly to make this show what it is. You are the very best in the business – the kindest, most fun, most loyal, and definitely the hardest-working team in television.
Thank you for your laughter, the friendship, and the countless memories over all these years. You’ve filled my heart in ways I’ll never forget. I’ll miss you all so much.
And to you – the viewers at home – the biggest thank you of all. Thank you for welcoming us into your homes for over two decades.
Your love, loyalty, and unwavering support have meant the world. You’ve carried us through every series, and that has never, ever been taken for granted. You are the heart of this show, and I feel so lucky to have shared it with you. Being part of your weekend from September to Christmas for the past 21 years has been one of the greatest joys and privileges of my career.
To my beloved Claud – what an absolute joy and pleasure it has been sharing this adventure with you. You’re one of a kind, and I’ll treasure every giggle, every live show, and every backstage moment we’ve shared. I’m so grateful to have you as my friend for life.
This isn’t goodbye to glitter, sequins, or Saturday night sparkle (I could never say goodbye to those!). Strictly will forever hold a special place in my heart – but it does feel like the right time to hand over the reins.
With all my love and endless gratitude, Tess x
Tess Daly has been on the show since its very first episode seeing over 300 celebrities enter the ballroom and join the competition.
She started the show with Sir Bruce Forsyth, with Claudia Winkleman being a part of their presenting team hosting the sister show It Takes Two.
The duo made history in 2014 becoming the first female presenting duo of a prime time slot.
As a team they have welcomed almost 200 celebrities into the ballroom.
Over their time on the show they have also seen nine judges join and leave the show.
Claudia Winkleman’s statement reads:
It’s very difficult to put into words exactly what Strictly has meant to me. It’s been the greatest relationship of my career. From working on It Takes Two in 2004 until now it has been my everything, the show I will be eternally grateful for. I will never forget Len Goodman trying to teach me what a cucaracha is (I still don’t know) and the complete thrill and honour it was to work with Tess on the results show to cohosting on Saturday nights.
Strictly is a magical, glittery, fake tanned train and it’s been a privilege to be a tiny part of it. The extraordinary talent of the dancers, the band, the hair and makeup and costume teams, the unbelievable production crew and creatives – all utterly amazing. I’ve always believed it’s best to leave a party before you’re fully ready to go and I know the new hosts will be magnificent, I look forward to watching them take Strictly to new heights. As for Tess – I’m so so lucky I got to stand next to you. You’re funny, kind, whip smart and a true friend and I love you.
With two of the biggest jobs in the BBC now up for grabs who will we see step into the glitz and glammer of Saturday night at Strictly Come Dancing?
-
Football9 years agoFootball – Winchester City vs Didcot Town
-
Community8 years agoWinnall community association renovated
-
Community8 years ago
Hampshire’s frontline services at risk
-
Hampshire8 years agoUniversity of Winchester Parking Trouble
-
Community8 years ago
Knight Bus unveiled at school
-
Community8 years ago‘Controversial’ new plans take shape in Eastleigh
-
Winchester News Online8 years ago#MiracleMissy Update
-
Bulletins7 years agoWINOL 20 November 2018
