Connect with us

Culture

REVIEW: Life Of Pi at Mayflower Theatre

Owen Noon

Published

on

Life of Pi

If you could share a desert island (or boat) with one person, who would it be? I bet the answer to that question wouldn’t be a Bengal Tiger. ‘Life Of Pi’ has sailed its way into Mayflower Theatre, and I for one was very excited to see this multi-award winning play. Holding five Oliviers and three Tonys, this play has already put itself up there as one of the big, must-see plays in the theatre world. I’m sure a lot of people have heard of ‘Life Of Pi’, most likely from the 2012 film of the same name. However this isn’t just a stage adaptation of the movie, it’s a stage adaptation of Yann Martel’s novel. So we know that Martel’s story translates well onto the big screen, but will it translate well onto the stage? I think playwright Lolita Chakrabati has found the sweet spot between fantasy and reality perfectly in telling this story live.

If you’re unaware of the story, to keep the sense of mystery and to avoid spoilers, it follows a young boy – ‘Pi’ – and his story of when he gets stranded at sea with certain animals. Now if you’ve seen the movie, you will also be aware that it heavily relies on the use of CGI when it comes to the animals (particularly the tiger). Obviously this is a big problem when trying to bring a story to life on stage, and if anyone is thinking, no they didn’t use real animals. Instead they used puppets, and these puppets are insanely impressive. Other shows such as ‘The Lion King’ and ‘War Horse’ use similar puppetry techniques, and ‘Life Of Pi’ has followed in their footsteps superbly.

The whole cast has been directed and choreographed to perfection.

Without the puppets, I don’t think this show would be anywhere near as impressive as it is. The puppets make the show, but the cast have an integral role in all of this. Heading the cast tonight was Adwitha Arumugam as ‘Pi’, making ‘Pi’ a female character for the night. I love it when shows have the ability to do this with characters, especially leading ones. It’s something that throws you off to begin with, but then as it plays on you understand it. Adwitha was fantastic either way. She had a great bond with the puppets and used her movement brilliantly. In fact the whole cast has been directed and choreographed to perfection. There’s so much of this play that relies heavily on the movement of set or discrete character pieces; Max Webster (director) and Finn Caldwell (puppetry & movement director) have nailed this here! Hats off to the all of the cast because discrete movements that the story depends on, are so much harder and more important than the ability to learn a monologue in my opinion.

I’ve already briefly mentioned the puppets which were phenomenal, but the set was also one that you’d expect to see win awards (which it has!). The set was stunning. It was clever, intricate, big, and beautiful. In a second you could be transported from Mexico, to the ocean, to India – and it was seamless. This was definitely aided by the impressive lighting set up as well however. I’ve been to a few shows recently that have used digital effects, which do work but are nowhere near as effective as physical ones. The lighting and projections of when it was raining/thundering were particularly impressive – and just the way the depicted the ocean really really worked.

There was one moment where the ‘big ship’ was travelling the world and to show the route of this, there was a projected mini map showing its direction with a physical small steam boat that was puppeteered across the stage. The red laser lighting showing its ‘path’ as it continued its way across the stage was a great touch. This is something so simple and quick, but I just loved it! 

If you’re a fan of a hearty, thought-provoking story – then this play is for you.

Not only was the puppeteering of the puppets amazing, I think it was the overall design of them which was something abstract and different to what has previously been seen on stage. They are pieces of art. The tiger, the orangutan, the hyena, and the zebra. All incredible. The music was played through a soundtrack and I think this is one of the only times that I think it didn’t need a live band/orchestra. It would’ve been overkill, and the soundtrack did its job perfectly. 

I had actually never seen the movie before tonight so was going in with completely fresh mind and not really sure what to expect. The story was brilliant. A little bit slow at times I must admit, but come the second act, that’s where things really start to get exciting. I didn’t get lost once during the show, but I do wish that they shuffled a couple of bits on a little bit quicker. Having said this however, I think this is more just the nature of how plays work. If you were a fan of the movie or book and haven’t seen ‘Life Of Pi’ yet, you’re definitely missing out! Likewise if you’re a fan of a hearty, thought-provoking story – then this play is also for you. ‘Life Of Pi’ is at Mayflower theatre until the 18th May before continuing on its UK tour, and if you’re around and fancy being impressed, go give it a watch. I wish all the cast and crew the best of luck going forward, I wouldn’t be surprised if we see them with some more silverware soon. 

Continue Reading

Culture

Hampstead movie review

Avatar

Published

on

Hampsted movie poster

With the passing of Diane Keaton I decided that I would watch some of her old work.

I chose to watch the 2017 movie Hampstead as it seemed to be quite a good representation of her acting skills. 

It is based loosely (trying not to give the plot away, however it did come out eight years ago!) on Harry Hallowes real life, he used to live on a plot in Hampstead Heath and then managed to claim rights on it. 

One of the best parts of this movie was the chemistry between Diane Keaton and Brendan Gleeson.

It felt natural and not strained which definitely made it more believable for me.

Their chemistry also helped make their characters seem more natural making their performance that much better. 

I’m not one who normally enjoys romantic (some may say sappy) movies but the mixture of romance and social justice themes in this movie made it not too uncomfortable.

It gives the audience a feel-good time with us feeling like we are doing something right, due to us deciding that Gleeson’s character is right.

It made me feel like I was standing up for the underdog and marginalised communities.

I found it quite clever how they made it an easy movie to watch, not too many sad themes, while also fitting in the themes of community and standing up for the right thing.

I would say that if you are feeling a bit down then this would be a very good movie too watch. 

A perfect movie for a light matinee

As a nature person, the setting of this film was spectacular.

I really liked the idea of an expanse of nature so close to a city.

It creates a very picturesque backdrop for the movie which further added to the warmthness portrayed throughout the movie.

I especially liked where Keaton’s character ended up living in the end. 

However, as always there are critics.

With this movie one of the big critiques was that the story was very predictable and followed the same formula that a lot of other romance movies used.

There was just too many cliches which made it painful for the audience to witness again and due to the lack of surprises it was not the most engaging film to watch.

This goes hand in hand with the fact that the characters where more broad and stereotypical than they should have been. 

The other big critique from this movie was that people thought it lacked tone and depth, saying that while it did touch on different societal problems such as eviction, class divide and property divide it didn’t pronounce it enough.

It felt a bit like dipping one toe into the water of the problems.

While I do agree that it didn’t delve deep into the problems society faces, I didn’t think that was what the movie was about or what the directors were trying to get across to the audience.

I believe that it was simply highlighting these issues in an easy to understand way. 

Continue Reading

Culture

Are Max Martin and Shellback the downfall of Taylor Swift’s latest album?

Avatar

Published

on

The release of Taylor Swift’s 12th LP, The Life of a Showgirl, has been met with divided opinions. 

Although a record breaking 2.7m albums were sold on the first day of release, not all these buyers are satisfied.

It might be a push to say the majority are. Online, listeners argue this album is “millennial cringe” and that Swift is showing her “true capitalist self”. 

Alongside Swift herself, Max Martin and Shellback produced the album.

Long-time collaborators, they previously helped define 1989 and Reputation. But this marks the first time the trio have exclusively worked together.

1989 and Reputation catapulted Swift to global pop fame.

Through hits such as Blank Space, Shake it Off and Getaway Car, Martin and Shellback provided Swift a clean break from her country roots, throwing her into the deep end of mainstream pop.

However, a decade later the formula feels tired.

So why has The Life of a Showgirl fallen so flat?

Following Swift’s last album The Tortured Poets Department, a lyrically rich 31 song LP radiating heartbreak and introspection, the synthetic glitz and glamour of Showgirl feel false. 

In a post-Folklore world, where Swift proved her strength as a lyricist with the help of producer Jack Antonoff, the return to maximalism and Martin-Shellback production feels hollow. 

With the loss of Antonoff and the return of Martin and Shellback, has Swift lost the reflective heart of her songwriting? 

That’s not to say Showgirl is without merit.

Its production is faultless, and the album follows a clear and fluid theme.

But perhaps that’s the problem. In collaborating solely with Martin and Shellback, Swift may have created her most technically accomplished album but her least emotionally convincing one. 

Whether this is a misstep or the purpose of the album remains to be seen.

But the reception of The Life of a Showgirl questions the path Swift is on.

Now the world dominating Eras Tour is over, is the peak of Swift’s career over too?

Continue Reading

Culture

The End of Strictly Come Dancing as we know it?

Emily Byway

Published

on

We all know Strictly Come Dancing as one of the most popular prime time slots on a Saturday night.
But could this be the end of Strictly as we know it?


The BBCs show has struggled recently with allegations of bullying and inappropriate behaviour, but now Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman have released a joint statement to say they are passing the sparkly button on at the end of this series.


Their Instagram statement in full:

We have loved working as a duo and hosting Strictly has been an absolute dream. We were always going to leave together and now feels like the right time. We will have the greatest rest of this amazing series and we just want to say an enormous thank you to the BBC and to every single person who works on the show. They’re the most brilliant team and we’ll miss them every day. We will cry when we say the last “keep dancing” but we will continue to say it to each other. Just possibly in tracksuit bottoms at home while holding some pizza.
Tess & Claud

Following their joint statement they each released their own statements as a follow up.

Tess Daly’s statement in full:

After 21 unforgettable years, the time has come to say goodbye to Strictly Come Dancing. It’s hard to put into words what this show has meant to me, so here goes… Strictly has been more than just a television programme. It’s felt like having a third child, a second family, and a huge part of my life since that very first show back in 2004. I knew then it was something special, but I could never have imagined the magic it would bring.

Strictly has always been about joy, celebration, and bringing people together – and I’m so proud to have played a small part in something that continues to mean so much to so many.

From that very first series, I had the great honour of standing alongside the incomparable Sit Bruce Forsyth.

Brucie set the tine for everything that Strictly became: warmth, wit, connection, and pure showbiz magic.

I have always been in awe of our superbly talented professional dancers, our magnificent judges, and all the celebrities who have taken part. I absolutely adore our brilliant crew – every single member of the Strictly team who have worked tirelessly to make this show what it is. You are the very best in the business – the kindest, most fun, most loyal, and definitely the hardest-working team in television.

Thank you for your laughter, the friendship, and the countless memories over all these years. You’ve filled my heart in ways I’ll never forget. I’ll miss you all so much.

And to you – the viewers at home – the biggest thank you of all. Thank you for welcoming us into your homes for over two decades.

Your love, loyalty, and unwavering support have meant the world. You’ve carried us through every series, and that has never, ever been taken for granted. You are the heart of this show, and I feel so lucky to have shared it with you. Being part of your weekend from September to Christmas for the past 21 years has been one of the greatest joys and privileges of my career.

To my beloved Claud – what an absolute joy and pleasure it has been sharing this adventure with you. You’re one of a kind, and I’ll treasure every giggle, every live show, and every backstage moment we’ve shared. I’m so grateful to have you as my friend for life.

This isn’t goodbye to glitter, sequins, or Saturday night sparkle (I could never say goodbye to those!). Strictly will forever hold a special place in my heart – but it does feel like the right time to hand over the reins.

With all my love and endless gratitude, Tess x


Tess Daly has been on the show since its very first episode seeing over 300 celebrities enter the ballroom and join the competition.

She started the show with Sir Bruce Forsyth, with Claudia Winkleman being a part of their presenting team hosting the sister show It Takes Two.

The duo made history in 2014 becoming the first female presenting duo of a prime time slot.
As a team they have welcomed almost 200 celebrities into the ballroom.

Over their time on the show they have also seen nine judges join and leave the show.

Claudia Winkleman’s statement reads:
It’s very difficult to put into words exactly what Strictly has meant to me. It’s been the greatest relationship of my career. From working on It Takes Two in 2004 until now it has been my everything, the show I will be eternally grateful for. I will never forget Len Goodman trying to teach me what a cucaracha is (I still don’t know) and the complete thrill and honour it was to work with Tess on the results show to cohosting on Saturday nights.

Strictly is a magical, glittery, fake tanned train and it’s been a privilege to be a tiny part of it. The extraordinary talent of the dancers, the band, the hair and makeup and costume teams, the unbelievable production crew and creatives – all utterly amazing. I’ve always believed it’s best to leave a party before you’re fully ready to go and I know the new hosts will be magnificent, I look forward to watching them take Strictly to new heights. As for Tess – I’m so so lucky I got to stand next to you. You’re funny, kind, whip smart and a true friend and I love you.


With two of the biggest jobs in the BBC now up for grabs who will we see step into the glitz and glammer of Saturday night at Strictly Come Dancing?

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.