A motorcycle engineer from Hampshire is preparing to ride hundreds of miles across the UK dressed as a chicken to raise money for a hospital cancer ward that has cared for his wife.

Debben Performance owner Steve Debben is planning to ride a 1967 175cc Bantam, which was once his grandad’s, from Burnmouth to Bournemouth next month.

The 419 mile trip is to raise money for the Nick Jonas Cancer Ward at Royal Hampshire County Hospital, where Steve says staff have provided exceptional care to his wife Jodie during her cancer treatment.

“My wife has been there since last year, it’s been an ongoing thing,” he explained. 

“The staff are amazing, they’re handpicked for the job.I just want them to know how grateful I am, it’s a lovely place” 

The route will see him leave Burnmouth Harbour at 8am on Friday 3rd of April, in hope to be there in time for midday Monday 6th of April to the south coast of England on the small vintage motorcycle but whilst wearing a chicken costume.

He hopes the unusual challenge will help attract attention and encourage people to donate to the ward.

“I’m aiming to be there around lunchtime. My wife, Jodie, will be waiting for me at Undercliff Drive on the seafront, it has a romantic meaning for us it’s where we had our first kiss”

“With me being dressed up as a chicken, it means there’s going to be more awareness and people would be more willing to donate.”

But Steve has his doubts before making the journey. 

“I dont even know if I can make it, I can’t use motorways. It’s my first time doing something like this, there’s not been any real planning.”

“It will take three and half to four days. I’ve had people say they want to meet me on the way – there’s a bit of pressure.”

The bike Steve will be using was inherited from his grandfather, a bike that he had a lot of childhood memories with. 

“It was in his shed under an orange cover for as long as I can remember, as a kid I would sneak off and go see it. I would never have thought that I would be driving from Burnmouth to Bouremouth with it. 

The event is set to take place on the 3rd of April to the 6th of April, and it’s already raised nearly £3,000.

Despite having been in a devastating full-scale conflict with its imperialist neighbour for almost four years, the nation of Ukraine is not only fighting for its survival, but also its future.

One way in which the fragile nation is attempting to protect its uncertain future is by promoting tourism within its borders.

While for many countries around the world, such as Spain or Australia, this is an almost effortless undertaking, for tourism boards within Ukraine, a country currently ravaged by war, and frequent drone and missile attacks, it has proved substantially more difficult.

As of the writing of the article, about 20% of Ukraine’s internationally recognised territory is currently pressed beneath the boot of Russian occupation, with this being the case for Crimea, and parts of the Eastern Donbas region since 2014.

Major cities such as Kharkiv, Kyiv, Odessa, and Lviv are no longer considered safe, with the UK government strongly discouraging any travel whatsoever to the vast majority of the country.

Before Russia’s military ambitions reared their ugly head in Ukraine in 2014, the nation saw about 20 million tourists annually, with the majority of them travelling to cities such as Lviv, Sevastopol (Crimea), and the capital of Kyiv.

The 2014 annexation of Crimea saw the number of tourists to Ukraine plummet by around 50%, primarily due to safety concerns, coupled with the fact that Crimea was considered a major attraction within Ukraine by internal and external tourists alike due to its more arid climate and stunning coastline on the Black Sea.

While constant war and threats of death continue within Ukraine, tourism still prevails within the nation, with almost 1.2 million people deciding to ignore the many warnings issued by their governments and entering.

The vast majority of those entering Ukraine during wartime are known as “War Tourists”.

The idea of war tourism itself is highly controversial in the modern era, primarily due to the fact that while some see it as a way to spread awareness of a struggling country while contributing to its economy and absorbing its rich culture, many others see it as taking advantage of a deeply troubling situation for attention and glorifying the deaths of both military personnel and civilians.

No matter which of these two arguments best represents your opinion on the issue, it is undeniable that tourism is beneficial to the economy of any nation, especially those that are at war.

The Visit Ukraine tourism site, was originally founded in 2021 in order to act as a guide to anyone intending to travel to the country, however it has since transformed into providing advice regarding how to navigate travel plans around the ongoing war, while remaining as safe as possible.

The site heavily advises that anyone wishing to enter Ukraine purchases “cost of war risk insurance,” which can be as cheap as three Euros, as even in the less affected parts of the country, risk of collateral damage is never zero, no matter how far they are from the front.

Being the largest country in all of Europe, when excluding Russia of course, Ukraine is home to a countless eray of stunning cities, towns and villages.

While it would be ideal to be able to encourage travel to each and every one of these locations, the war has made the potential costs of visiting such places too much for the average tourist to bear.

Despite this, however, many areas within the West of the country are relatively safe compared to its more central and Eastern regions/oblasts.

According to “Visit Ukraine”, tourism numbers in cities such as Lviv have actually increased since 2021, just one year before the declaration of full-scale war.

When talking about the West of Ukraine, it would be impossible not to mention the city of Uzhhorod.

Located in the far west of the country within the Zakarpattia Oblast, nestled against the border with Slovakia, the city of Uzhhorod is highly relevant within Ukraine today, as it is the largest city within the whole country that has not, as of yet, been hit by a single drone or missile, making it arguably Ukraine’s safest city as of now.

The city itself is vital to the Ukrainian military and civilian populations, as it houses thousands of refugees from regions more significantly affected by the war, especially young children, and injured soldiers who need time to heal and recover from injuries sustained in battle without needing to undergo the complicated process of leaving the borders of their homeland.

Additionally, cities such as Lviv are also commonly visited by tourists who decide to visit during wartime, since tourism has actually increased within the city, as mentioned previously.

While cities like Lviv, the capital of Kyiv, and many other urban areas within Ukraine are littered with bunkers in order to protect both civilians and tourists, they can nevertheless see days or even weeks of seemingly constant missile and drone bombardment, where civilian infrastructure is often targeted, taking the lives of dozens.

Obviously, since Ukraine has been fighting a full-scale war for almost half a decade, a plethora of members of the armed forces are critically injured, with those that survive needing rapidly supplied blood transfusions in order to save their lives.

Because of this fact, for any tourist that feels an obligation to help the Ukrainian cause in a more impactful way than just contributing to the economy, they can donate blood and/or blood plasma.

This could easily be seen as a moral workaround for anyone who leans towards the argument that tourism within Ukraine would be immoral, as in this case, you being there as a tourist and donating your blood would not only benefit the Ukrainian cause, but also potentially save the lives of someone’s son, husband and father.

To conclude, it is inevitable that some people will feel completely disgusted at even the idea of visiting a nation devastated by war, such as Ukraine, as a tourist, expecting a large aray of services to be provided.

While this argument does hold substantial weight, the fact is that if you take steps to benefit the people of Ukraine while spending time there by donating blood when visiting cities such as Uzhhorod, that are currently home to numerous injured soldiers and civilians in need of life saving aid then the nation will be slightly better off for it, and you will be doing a service, rather than purely having a service provided to you at the expense of the citizens.

Colden Common strengthened their grip at the top of Wessex Division One with a 3–1 comeback win over play-off hopefuls Cove.

Cove took the lead when Ash Upson met Armani Riley’s corner with a towering header at the back post.

They nearly doubled their lead soon after. Noah Ayres fired a low effort past James Egeland-Jensen but the flag was raised for offside, before Will Okine-Peters came within inches of making it two, his powerful header crashing against the crossbar from close range.

But the Stallions responded almost immediately. Just two minutes after Okine-Peters’ effort rattled the woodwork, Colden Common broke quickly on the counter. Brad Lethbridge picked out new signing Joe Johnson, who showed great composure to lob goalkeeper Stuart Norman and score his first goal for the club.

Colden Common pushed for a second before the break. Cal Archer saw his header strike the post, while Charlie Hitchings and Will Erdinc both tried their luck from distance but failed to test Norman.

Cove threatened again early in the second half. Okine-Peters found Charlie Oakley on the right, but he could only fire wide, before Higgs’ deflected strike forced a superb save from Egeland-Jensen after the ball deflected off Cam Stone.

Those missed chances proved costly. Hitchings soon picked out Sam Woodward in acres of space and the forward made no mistake, curling a composed finish into the bottom corner to give Colden Common the lead. The goal marked Woodward’s sixth in just seven appearances for the club.

Cove’s afternoon then took another turn for the worse when striker Kay Hampson was shown a straight red card following a challenge on Stone, reducing the Wasps to ten men.

Colden Common capitalised late on, adding a third through Stone after a well-worked move.

The hosts could even have added a fourth, with Woodward denied by a fine save before Johnson fired wide.

After the match, manager Steve King praised his side’s second-half display.

“I thought we controlled the second half and got the goals we deserved against a fellow promotion chaser,” he said.

 “The sending off didn’t change the game, we kept moving the ball quickly and I’m really pleased with the third goal.”

Colden Common are next in action with a trip to Miller Park, where they face strugglers Totton & Eling.